This blog is maintained by Shawn Williamson, a student at Appalachian State University in Boone, NC.
This blog was created for an English class dealing with digital writing, including blogs and other writing for the web.

This blog is now currently being used for the Senior Seminar in Computer Science course.

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

A Fan of Writing

Having taken a sophomore-level English class before, I had low expectations for how interested I would be with this class.  I was surprised to find that the class was engaging and fun to be in during group discussions.  The quick-writes and the blog post discussion helped me understand what everyone else in the class was thinking about while they were writing.  It helped me understand how they write, and it helped me understand how I write as well.
I’ve had a lot of experience writing narratives.  Fan fiction is a good source of entertainment for me, both in reading and writing.  I use it as an outlet when my head gets too full of ideas.  I took a break from writing any during the summer since this writing class was making me write and helping me clear my mind.  That’s what I think writing does for me: it clears my mind.  I never really thought about this before entering this class, but writing helps me.  I enjoy it whereas most students see writing as just another assignment to be done.
Because of my work with fan fiction, I already have a little experience with web-based writing.  When the first pieces of fan fiction were first written, the Internet hadn’t been invented yet so they were shared locally and at conventions.  Star Trek is usually recognized as the first well-known series to have fan fiction written about it.  Today, almost all fan fiction writing is done on computers and shared electronically.  Fanfiction.net is probably the most well-known online source for sharing and reading fan fiction.  It houses literally millions of stories from hundreds of different series written by authors from all over the world.
Despite my experience with fan fiction, I have never extensively used a blog for any kind of writing.  My previous sophomore English class dabbled in some Twitter posts, but blog websites like WordPress and BlogSpot were left alone.  I have learned to appreciate what the Internet is doing for us now.  Using literally hundreds of different websites, we can share our opinions, thoughts, and daily lives with millions, even billions, of people.  What amazes me is that all of this is done without a second thought, as if it were the most normal thing in the world.
This class has helped me greatly to realize the importance of my writing voice.  When it comes to narratives, it’s easy to overlook the author’s voice because it gets masked by the characters of the story.  Analysis and research papers allow the author’s voice to reach directly to the audience, giving it a much more important place in those writing styles.  I’ve never really paid attention to my writing voice outside of my narrative work.  For high school- and college-level essays, teachers and professors tend to want a stoic, nearly emotionless writing style that meets the criteria and doesn’t exceed it.  In retrospect, that kind of expectation is harmful since it gives the impression that the real world won’t want you to exceed expectations.
My writing voice is certainly a weak point for me.  My mindset defaults to the simple, guided essay that everyone was taught in middle and high school.  We were all told that using first person point-of-view is the worst thing for any kind of paper, but that keeps the author from really connecting themselves with what they’re writing, especially in an argumentative essay.  Being unable to use the first person handicaps the author and prevents them from really expressing their own true feelings.  No matter how much research you have to back up a claim, it doesn’t help if you can’t get the words out.
Research papers have always been my weak point.  Especially for papers that require a set amount of sources to use, I have problems finding sources.  I tend to choose topics that either don’t have any kind of written sources or the sources deal with a very similar issue that kind of skirts around my topic without mentioning it.  Narratives, on the other hand, have always been my strongest writing style.  I can’t write a narrative from scratch like a professional author, but if I can have some kind of premise to start with or character to borrow, I can crank out narratives like there’s no tomorrow.
For example, in my high school English class, we were required to write a narrative that resembled a Native American folk tale dealing with the creation of the earth.  While everyone groaned and whined about the assignment, I had already begun forming the premise of exactly what I wanted in my head.  I borrowed the idea of the creator being a wolf from a video game I had been playing at the time, and I set up a monologue for the creator-wolf character to speak without anyone to answer.  This solitude would give the wolf reason to create the earth so that he would have companionship.  The ideas flowed easily for me, whereas my classmates had trouble wondering where to even begin.
For me, writing is an escape.  It helps me release pent up feelings in a way that doesn’t harm anyone.  And web writing, like fan fiction, can even help other by providing entertainment.  Despite my irritation for research papers, I still find that I enjoyed the process once I look back over them, particularly is I chose an interesting topic that will get the readers’ attention.  Because I enjoy writing, it’s easy for me to enjoy reading as well.  I can understand my own work that much better because of that.

Creativity in Schools: Preventing Kids from Building a Better Mouse Trap

           Creative and critical thinking are two different processes that use many similar and divergent techniques to accomplish great outcomes.  Creative thinking is what pioneers the human race forward through innovation.  Critical thinking applies analytical skill in discovering why something is the way it is.  Both creative and critical thinking are highly important for a growing mind (and for those already grown). Despite this, schools today often give way to a curriculum focused more on critical thinking, which hampers the growth of creative tendencies in children.
            To clarify, I’m certainly not trying to say that learning critical thinking skills is bad.  Obviously, understanding why events took place in history, why rhetorical appeals work, and why a certain compound is made when combining two elements are all important as a general education.  Being able to apply that critical thinking to other areas of learning and teaching is wonderful as well, but there comes a time when someone has to say “I understand how and why it works, but how can we make it better?”  This is the main idea behind creative thinking.
            One can analyze something all day long and never find anything truly new; someone will likely have analyzed it before and found the same thing.  Creativity works differently, though.  It requires one to think of something that no one else has thought of before.  Robots are a good example: robotic craft sent to other planets in our solar system analyze materials and objects found there, but it requires the ingenuity of a live person to understand it and do something with it.  As Soichiro Honda, founder of Honda Motor Company, said, “It is when man starts thinking of ideas that the difference between man and machine emerges.”
 
            Mihalyi Csikszentmihalyi, famous for both his work in the study of creativity and his incredibly difficult-to-pronounce name, separates creativity into two separate categories.  “Big C” creativity is described as “paradigm-shifting” and encompasses events that are generally out of a person’s control.  “Little c” creativity is commonly experienced, usually in everyday life (Mihalyi 30).  Tina Sue Fletcher, who referenced Mihayli as a reference in her Creative Thinking in Schools article, further explains, “A person may not be able to change his world in a big way, but in the spirit of building a better mousetrap, he can come up with new ideas, explorations, and solutions that are both stimulating and satisfying.” (Fletcher)  It can certainly be difficult for a single human being to change the world, even with a creative mind, but it is this mindset that allows technology and culture to advance.
            The best place to start cultivating creative thinking skills is with early education.  Obviously, some parts of the education system are fixed for certain schools; financial resources and learning environments generally remain the same over a particular child’s school career.  However, the teaching techniques and curricula can be altered to nurture the creative thinking skills that will help children become highly active and intelligent members of society (Fletcher).
Positive motivations have been known to encourage greater productivity that negative motivations, such as times constraints.  Giving children opportunities to foster their own creativity by themselves is a great way to avoid these problems, Fletcher suggests.  Short creativity exercises, less busy work and more free time, encourage risk-taking and preserve integrity even when the children’s efforts may fail are excellent methods to nurture creativity for young children.  The same methods can be applied to more mature groups in middle or even high schools; some changes would have to be made for conflicting interests, but the main ideas of encouragement and integrity would remain.
            According to Sir Ken Robinson, a well-known author, public speaker, and advisor on education, the current environment for teaching children makes them frightened of being “wrong.”  Robinson says “[…] if you’re not prepared to be wrong, you’ll never come up with anything original.”  The stigma that we as human beings place on making mistakes frightens children and even grown adults into remaining commonplace.  Children are known for their innate curiosity and their ability to say and do anything that comes immediately to mind (TED.com).  School systems tend to look down upon this behavior, particularly in talented children who may seem non-conformist and hard to deal with (Fletcher).  By the time the children are adults, Robinson says, the innate curiosity and creativity has been mostly washed away.
            Phineas and Ferb, a popular cartoon show on Disney Channel, provides a good humorous and satirical example of what Sir Robinson is saying.  Phineas and Ferb are two young boys with enormous amounts of imagination and creativity; they spend every day of their summer vacation (which seems to never end despite the series broadcasting a special Christmas episode) building huge constructs like roller coasters, proving accepted ideas of history and science wrong, and even crafting a working airplane out of paper-mache.  In one episode the boys get caught by their parents, who were previously unaware of the boy’s creations and adventures.  They are sent to a reform school because of their dangerous “overly-creative” behavior.  Through a series of punishments and warnings, Phineas and Ferb eventually become brainwashed drones that speak in dull tones and refuse to even touch a screwdriver.
            Even though the cartoon is based on humor and this particular episode involves a lot of humor and satire, it provides a good example of what schools and parents may resort to in order to squash creative tendencies.  Obviously schools, parents and even reform schools never take their actions to this extreme, but it does serve as a sort of warning for what can happen if society were to ever place such an extreme stigma on creative thinking.
            In order to build the original mousetrap, someone had to first analyze the initial problem and come up with a creative solution.  After that, someone else designed a new model that worked better.  This process of build and redesign happens all over the world, combining thoughts from great creative minds from over thousands of years.  If school systems stifle those creative juices in children today, it is unlikely that they will be able to build upon the ideas of the current generation much like we have in recent years.  Even if no one person can dream big enough to change the entire world, it only takes one idea to make a difference.


Works Cited
Csikszentmihalyi, Mihalyi.  Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery           and invention.  New York: HarperCollins, 1996.  Print.
Fletcher, Tina Sue. “Creative Thinking in Schools: Finding the “Just Right”           Challenge for Students.” Gifted Child Today Vol. 34 Issue 2 (2011):           37-42. Web. 25 July 2011.
"Ken Robinson Says Schools Kill Creativity | Video on TED.com." TED: Ideas           worth Spreading. June 2006. Web. 28 July 2011.
          <http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng
          /ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity.html
>.


(Images used from http://beamazinglearning.wordpress.com/tag/creativity/, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dx2mGZ52WSM, and http://www.flickr.com/photos/23486066@N04/2242941795/)