This blog is maintained by Shawn Williamson, a student at Appalachian State University in Boone, NC.
This blog was created for an English class dealing with digital writing, including blogs and other writing for the web.

This blog is now currently being used for the Senior Seminar in Computer Science course.

Sunday, July 24, 2011

A Farmer's Market

           It seems like commercials today are beginning to use more humor to persuade the populace to buy products.  Recent examples of this can be found in advertisements for insurance companies. These companies tend to use humor in their commercials to make them memorable; if people remember an advertisement because it was funny they may buy the product or be interested in using a certain insurance company.  State Farm and Farmers Insurance are two of the more recent companies to enter the humor-in-insurance-advertising game.  Both provide substance to what they are attempting to sell while still using humor, logic, and each firm’s established credibility to push their products.  The rhetorical appeals presented in the two chosen advertisements[1] by these companies make them stand out from each other.
            The main reasons that the two advertisements are so memorable are humor and credibility.  The credibility and humor together help people remember the commercial because of the way the products are presented.  State Farm is widely known for their “Like a good neighbor” jingle while Farmers Insurance is popular because of their recurring use of J.K. Simmons as the Professor Nathaniel Burke character; Simmons is known for several popular movie and television roles and is very recognizable in person and voice.  By using these recurring themes in their advertisements, State Farm and Farmers both implant their products on the viewers’ memories.
            The Farmers commercials always show a group of insurance agents who are supposedly students at the fictional University of Farmers learning from the Professor Burke character.  State Farm’s commercials almost always only show a single agent in the field, inspecting the damage to whatever the focus of the commercial is.  The Farmers agents learn together and work well with each other, giving the feeling of a comfortable working environment.  On the other hand, State Farm’s humor comes solely from the “average” people who are making the insurance claim and the only logic comes from the end of the commercial where the voice over explains that State Farm insurance can “save you hundreds.”  In this respect, it seems to be that Farmers treats the viewers more like people actually looking for an insurance company rather than people just looking for a laugh.
            The advertisements used by Farmers Insurance display more logic than those aired by State Farm.  In most of State Farm’s commercials, humor turns out to be the main focus, usually centered on how people use “the jingle.”  On the other hand, the Farmers Insurance advertisement shows that the company can help them avoid disasters by explaining what can happen and what choices can be made.  This difference begins to show that Farmers takes a much more logical approach to their commercials than State Farm, but still retains enough humor to be memorable.  Because of this, it seems that Farmers provides[2] better rhetorical persuasions for their product compared to State Farm.
One could say that that State Farm’s jingle, “Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there,” appeals to the viewers’ logic by saying that the company will always be there for them.  It is meant to give a sense of trustworthiness to the viewers to that they will know that State Farm will be looking out for the customers’ interests first.  On the opposite side, the jingle that Farmers Insurance uses is simply a string of onomatopoeia, sounds that are not actually words.  It is catchy and easy to remember and connect with the company, but it does not give the same feeling that the State Farm jingle does.  Instead the Farmers jingle expands upon the idea of the agents working together.  The jingles work almost like slogans: easy to remember and mean to signify an individual company.  Most slogans, however, usually evoke some kind of emotion from the viewer that will make them want to buy or at least test the product being advertised.  Farmers manages to make their jingle easy to remember but fails to evoke the feeling of desire for the product.
Humor can go too far, though.  A friend of mine decided to test the State Farm jingle several weeks back.  He said aloud, “Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there with a million dollars.”  He said he was quite upset when nothing happened.  Obviously, my friend was joking and he hardly expected a State Farm agent to suddenly appear to give him a million dollars.  But this does show that humor, while it can be a good way to implant an advertisement in memory, can sometimes go too far.  It just so happens that going too far is all in good fun for my friend.
            The opening scenes of each commercial give the viewer an all-important first impression about what each insurance firm is selling.  Even though the State Farm’s advertisement begins with the main characters talking, the dialogue is unintelligible and mostly unimportant to the actual commercial; even the extended version not shown on television does not add any real importance to the opening, making longer and more uneventful.  The Farmers ad begins like all of their commercials: at the fictional “University of Farmers.”  Even the extended version of the State Farm commercial does not explain the opening frames, but the university opening provides a feeling of safety in trusting Farmers Insurance.  The idea that anyone who works at this insurance company must attend a “college” means that they obviously value the knowledge that their workers use.
            It is always important for the writers of an advertisement to know who they are aiming their product for.  In the case of almost any insurance company, that audience tends to be young to middle-aged adults, particularly those with a middle-class income.  Both of the chosen commercials deal with home or apartment damage.  These specific advertisements would appeal more to homeowners in the same age group, likely unaffected by gender or race.  While the State Farm advertisement shows the agent appearing (after the jingle) and inspecting the damage, the Farmers Insurance group observes the test demonstration going on involving water damage to a home and explain that agents should sit down with their customers to discuss what can be done to prevent this from happening and what should be done if it does.
Farmers again shows[2] a more logical approach in their advertising angle by attempting to be more personal with the potential customers.  Just the fact that the agents would want to “sit down with our clients so we can get to know them” is entirely different from the agent in the State Farm commercial that seems to ignore the boys in the commercial and go about her business.  Obviously, both commercials involve different situations, but the Farmers Insurance piece shows the viewer that a personal relationship is important for discussing and preventing future damage, an important issue to anyone buying home insurance.
After reviewing and analyzing both advertisements, Farmers Insurance seems to appeal to the logic of the audience more while the State Farm commercial uses humor to bring enjoyment.  Since both commercials likely target a similar audience, young to middle-aged home-owners (or those leasing an apartment), it seems the Farmers Insurance commercial would be more successful in keeping the viewers’ attention and evoking a desire to purchase an insurance policy.  While the State Farm advertisement would accomplish this as well, its focus on humor could possibly drive away some older viewers that would then be attracted by Farmers or another insurance agency.


[2] The firm’s name is listed as “Farmers Insurance” so these are not grammatical errors.

Thursday, July 14, 2011

What the People Want

David Lebovitz, owner and operator of the blog bearing his name, made a wonderful post that ties his normal food blog-related posts with some rules and expectations about web-writing and blogs.  One of the most important points that David makes, in my opinion deals with writing something that readers will find interesting.  Obviously, pretty much any piece of work that is or was written by a competent author wants to be entertaining to its readers, but doing that can be difficult.

One big idea that David gives is for you, the writer, to write about your own interests.  If you enjoy a certain type of food, or like playing a board game, make posts about those things.  Others may share the same feelings about what you posted.  Don't write about things that bore you; that's worse than writing about something you dislike.  At least if you dislike something you can make an argument for why you feel that way.  If something just holds no interest for you at all, how can your audience hold interest in what you write?

While David never specifically says this, it seems to me that a big part of his post deals with a writer's personality.  David mentions several times that many bloggers focus their work on earning as many hits as possible.  Instead of just writing to make it to the top of Google's search listing, bloggers should write for the sake or writing and to hold a conversation with the people that view their blog.  Personality is what defines any writer's style, and according to David, highlighting your own personality "is the most important thing you can do to differentiate yourself from others."

Presentation is another key point that David makes, the website layout can make or break a viewer's decision about your blog in one glance.  David even says that having his website designed by a professional was the most important thing he ever did for the site.  Drastic measures like that may not be the way to go for every website, but making your blog look clean and organized can certainly help shape the opinion of anyone that sees it.  Along with the layout, having more than just walls of text can help.  It's very easy to just skip past large blocks of text with no breaks in between; adding pictures or videos can help give your audience a break from constantly reading.

David's own entry follows these ideas well; he presents his post with an excellent layout, separating diverse ideas while still keeping a good flow between sections.  He also breaks his sections up by providing a list of resources and links that let the viewer rest from continued reading.  He also uses quotes to connect different ideas easily and shows that he knows the topic that he is writing about.  Rather than just telling the viewer what to do, David provides suggestions and even explanations about things that may not be common knowledge (such as the information about taking pictures).  David's post combines many different elements of good web-based writings and uses them to give an excellent guidebook to writings blogs.